Luxure PR Published in English
Luxure PR

Crisis communication

Sequence and accuracy, under time pressure and with incomplete information.

The problem is rarely the wording

Communication during a bad week fails for structural reasons far more often than stylistic ones: nobody is sure which version of events is correct, two parts of the organisation say different things within an hour of each other, and the first statement promises an update that never arrives. Each of those is a process failure that drafting cannot fix.

One confirmed account

The first task is establishing what is actually known, distinguishing it from what is suspected, and writing both down in one place that everyone who might be asked can see. This sounds bureaucratic and is the single most useful thing available. Without it, every person approached improvises, and the improvisations differ.

Holding, then updating

A holding statement is not evasion. It says what is known so far, says plainly that other things are not yet established, and states when the next update will come. Its value is that it is true when issued and still true a day later. Silence is read as concealment; a confident account that turns out to be wrong is far more damaging than an incomplete one that turns out to be right.

The stated update interval is a commitment. Meeting it with “we have nothing further to confirm” is better than missing it, because the interval is what stops other people filling the gap.

Order of disclosure

  1. Anyone directly affected, before anyone else.
  2. Staff, so they are not asked about something they have not heard.
  3. Bodies with a formal right to be told, on their own timetable.
  4. The public and the press, with the same account as everyone above.

Inverting that order is the most common avoidable mistake. It is also the one people remember longest, because being told by a stranger about something that concerns you is itself the injury.

Afterwards

The review that follows is a communication task in its own right: what was known when, where the account diverged, which channel was slow. It is most useful written while the sequence is still remembered accurately, and least useful when it is written to allocate blame.